Hom v. Hom

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Hom v. Hom

210 A.D.2d 298, 622 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13734

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 12, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 210 A.D.2d 298 (Hom v. Hom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hom v. Hom, 210 A.D.2d 298, 622 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

—Motion by the appellant on an appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated June 19, 1992, inter alia, to strike the respondent’s-brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition and relation thereto, it is,

Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that Page 1, Paragraph 4, Page 3, Paragraphs 2 and 3, Page 4, Paragraph 2, and the portion of Page 5, Paragraph 1 which alludes to the fact that the court ordered additional relief due to malpractice, are stricken, as they contain references to matters which are dehors the record. Those matters have not been considered on the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Motion by the appellant on an appeal from two orders of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, both dated June 19, 1992, inter alia, to strike the respondent’s-brief.

Upon the papers filed in support of the motion, and the papers filed in opposition and relation thereto, it is,

Ordered that the motion is granted to the extent that Page 1, Paragraph 4, Page 3, Paragraphs 2 and 3, Page 4, Paragraph 2, and the portion of Page 5, Paragraph 1 which alludes to the fact that the court ordered additional relief due to malpractice, are stricken, as they contain references to matters which are dehors the record. Those matters have not been considered on the appeal; and it is further,

Ordered that the motion is otherwise denied. Ritter, J. P., Santucci, Friedmann and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

210 A.D.2d 298, 622 N.Y.S.2d 452, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hom-v-hom-nyappdiv-1994.