Holzman v. Yeungling
147 A. 461, 106 N.J.L. 244, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 172
This text of 147 A. 461 (Holzman v. Yeungling) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holzman v. Yeungling, 147 A. 461, 106 N.J.L. 244, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 172 (N.J. 1929).
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chancellob, Chief Justice, Paekee, Black, Campbell, Case, Bodine, White, Yah Buskiek, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, JJ. 13.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
147 A. 461, 106 N.J.L. 244, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 172, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holzman-v-yeungling-nj-1929.