Holzer v. Sapadin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holzer v. Sapadin

260 A.D.2d 327, 687 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4624

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 29, 1999

StatusPublished

This text of 260 A.D.2d 327 (Holzer v. Sapadin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holzer v. Sapadin, 260 A.D.2d 327, 687 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4624 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lerner, J.), entered April 27, 1999, which, in a proceeding to invalidate certain nominating petitions, dismissed the petition as untimely, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the respondents’ nominating petitions are declared invalid pursuant to the findings of the trial court.

Under the unique circumstances presented, the petition was timely brought (Election Law § 16-102 [2]; L 1999, ch 12, § 4; cf., Matter of Pell v Coveney, 37 NY2d 494; Matter of Halloway v Blakely, 77 AD2d 932). Concur — Rubin, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward Lerner, J.), entered April 27, 1999, which, in a proceeding to invalidate certain nominating petitions, dismissed the petition as untimely, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the petition granted, and the respondents’ nominating petitions are declared invalid pursuant to the findings of the trial court.

Under the unique circumstances presented, the petition was timely brought (Election Law § 16-102 [2]; L 1999, ch 12, § 4; cf., Matter of Pell v Coveney, 37 NY2d 494; Matter of Halloway v Blakely, 77 AD2d 932). Concur — Rubin, J. P., Mazzarelli, Andrias, Buckley and Friedman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

260 A.D.2d 327, 687 N.Y.S.2d 255, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4624, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holzer-v-sapadin-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack