Holzer v. Avram
262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467
Opinion
—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 29, 1998, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants’ compliance with his notice to produce, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
We agree with the IAS Court that the notice in question is overbroad and unduly burdensome (see, Konrad v 136 E. 64th St. Corp., 209 AD2d 228). Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holzer v. Avram, 262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).
262 A.D.2d 239 (Holzer v. Avram) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.
209 A.D.2d 228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)