Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Holzer v. Avram

Holzer v. Avram

262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 24, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 262 A.D.2d 239 (Holzer v. Avram) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holzer v. Avram, 262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered on or about July 29, 1998, which, inter alia, denied plaintiff’s motion to compel defendants’ compliance with his notice to produce, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

We agree with the IAS Court that the notice in question is overbroad and unduly burdensome (see, Konrad v 136 E. 64th St. Corp., 209 AD2d 228). Concur — Mazzarelli, J. P., Wallach, Rubin, Andrias and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Konrad v. 136 East 64th Street Corp.
209 A.D.2d 228 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
262 A.D.2d 239, 690 N.Y.S.2d 453, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holzer-v-avram-nyappdiv-1999.