Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Papa

Connecticut Appellate Court

Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Papa

534 A.2d 917, 13 Conn. App. 808, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 1167

CourtConnecticut Appellate Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1987

Docket5234

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 534 A.2d 917 (Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Papa) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Appellate Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holyoke Mutual Insurance v. Papa, 534 A.2d 917, 13 Conn. App. 808, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 1167 (Colo. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

On June 30,1986, the plaintiff filed an appeal from an order of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for a protective order. On August 29, 1986, the plaintiff amended its appeal to include a claim that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for judgment on August 25,1986. Because we find that the trial court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for a protective order was not an appeal-able final judgment we dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27, 31, 463 A.2d 566 (1983); American Factors, Inc. v. Foreign Intrigue, Inc., 6 Conn. App. 656, 658, 506 A.2d 1085, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 802, 513 A.2d 696 (1986) (when [747]*747an appeal is jurisdictionally defective the defect cannot be cured by an amended appeal filed after judgment has entered).

The appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

On June 30,1986, the plaintiff filed an appeal from an order of the trial court granting the defendants’ motion for a protective order. On August 29, 1986, the plaintiff amended its appeal to include a claim that the trial court erred in granting the defendants’ motion for judgment on August 25,1986. Because we find that the trial court’s order granting the defendants’ motion for a protective order was not an appeal-able final judgment we dismiss the case for lack of jurisdiction. State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27, 31, 463 A.2d 566 (1983); American Factors, Inc. v. Foreign Intrigue, Inc., 6 Conn. App. 656, 658, 506 A.2d 1085, cert. denied, 201 Conn. 802, 513 A.2d 696 (1986) (when [747]*747an appeal is jurisdictionally defective the defect cannot be cured by an amended appeal filed after judgment has entered).

The appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

534 A.2d 917, 13 Conn. App. 808, 1987 Conn. App. LEXIS 1167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holyoke-mutual-insurance-v-papa-connappct-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack