Holyoke Machine Co. v. Franklin Paper Co.
97 Mass. 150
Opinion
1. The omission to affix the stamp required by the statute of the United States was not by design or with intent to defraud, and the omission having been supplied in the manner provided by the act of congress, the submission was rendered valid in like manner as if it had been duly stamped when made. U. S. St. 1866, c. 184, § 9. Tobey v. Chipman, 13 Allen, 123.
2. The matter of damages was by the terms of the submission entirely within the discretion of the arbitrators.
Exceptions overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holyoke Machine Co. v. Franklin Paper Co., 97 Mass. 150 (Mass. 1867).
97 Mass. 150 (Holyoke Machine Co. v. Franklin Paper Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gulesian v. St. James Amusement Co.
130 N.E. 212 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1921)
Bates v. Bailey
57 Ala. 73 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1876)
Randel v. Yates
48 Miss. 685 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1873)
Waterbury v. McMillan
46 Miss. 635 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1872)
Rheinstrom v. Cone
26 Wis. 163 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1870)
Janvrin v. Fogg
49 N.H. 340 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1870)