Holub v. United States

Fourth Circuit

Holub v. United States

390 F. App'x 257

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 6, 2010·No. No. 10-6453·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Holub appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice Holub’s motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Holub v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-00062-REM-DJJ, 2010 WL 987802 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lawrence Holub appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing with prejudice Holub’s motion for relief from judgment, filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Holub v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-00062-REM-DJJ, 2010 WL 987802 (N.D.W.Va. Mar. 15, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Holub v. United States, 390 F. App'x 257 (4th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

390 F. App'x 257 (Holub v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.