Holub v. Svoboda

242 A.D. 772

This text of 242 A.D. 772 (Holub v. Svoboda) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holub v. Svoboda, 242 A.D. 772 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1934).

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision imposing terms as a condition for the granting of the motion of defendant Anna Svoboda to set aside all proceedings subsequent to the joinder of issue, and as so modified affirmed, without costs. The order was properly made, but the circumstances were such that no terms should have been imposed, as the plaintiff proceeded at his peril when he disregarded the answer interposed by defendant Anna Svoboda, which presented a triable issue and which might either defeat the partition action in its entirety or result in a, greater dower admeasurement. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Carswell, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 A.D. 772, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holub-v-svoboda-nyappdiv-1934.