Holub v. Jacobwitz

197 A. 425, 123 N.J. Eq. 162, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 635
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedJanuary 26, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 197 A. 425 (Holub v. Jacobwitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holub v. Jacobwitz, 197 A. 425, 123 N.J. Eq. 162, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 635 (N.J. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lloyd, J.

The bill was filed by stockholders against the corporation defendant and its president and secretary-treasurer. The appeal is from an order refusing to strike out the bill.

We agree with the conclusion reached in the court below that the allegation's contained in the bill were sufficient to justify invoking the jurisdiction of the court of chancery, and that any attempt to obtain action by the officers defendants or the board of directors would have been futile.

The order is affirmed.

For affirmance — The Chiee-Justice, Parker, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Donges, Heher, Perskie, Wells, Woles-Keil, Eaeeerty, JJ. 11.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Prudential Ins. Co. Litig.
659 A.2d 961 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1995)
Cattafi v. O'Neill (In Re Nuisance Corp.)
17 B.R. 80 (D. New Jersey, 1981)
Bookman v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.
48 A.2d 646 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
197 A. 425, 123 N.J. Eq. 162, 1938 N.J. LEXIS 635, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holub-v-jacobwitz-njsuperctappdiv-1938.