Holub v. Babcock King Inc., No. Cv94 031 61 08 (Nov. 4, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11267-V, 12 Conn. L. Rptr. 634
Connecticut Superior Court·Decided November 4, 1994·No. No. CV94 031 61 08·Unpublished·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ORDER Pursuant to General Statutes § 52-156(a) it hereby is ordered that the plaintiff may take the depositions upon oral examination of the individuals listed in his petition. Pursuant to chapter 8 of the Connecticut Practice Book said depositions will pertain to the plaintiff's claim that he was discharged from his employment in retaliation for his alleged cooperation with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and that the reasons cited for his discharge were pretexts, which subject matter shall be broadly construed in accordance with Practice Book 218. Should any party wish the depositions to be videotaped, that party may file a motion with the court pursuant to Practice Book § 244(e).

BY THE COURT

LEVIN, JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holub v. Babcock King Inc., No. Cv94 031 61 08 (Nov. 4, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11267-V, 12 Conn. L. Rptr. 634 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 11267-V (Holub v. Babcock King Inc., No. Cv94 031 61 08 (Nov. 4, 1994)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Trombley v. Convalescent Center of Norwich, No. 543772 (Jun. 30, 1999)
1999 Conn. Super. Ct. 6758 (Connecticut Superior Court, 1999)