Holtzman v. Israel

Appellate Court of Illinois

Holtzman v. Israel

194 Ill. App. 474

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedOctober 5, 1915

DocketGen. No. 20,193

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 194 Ill. App. 474 (Holtzman v. Israel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holtzman v. Israel, 194 Ill. App. 474 (Ill. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Contracts, § 161*—when illegal purpose of one party does not invalidate. In an action to recover back money paid by plaintiff to defendant under a contract providing that the money should be returned under certain conditions, it is not a defense to the action that defendant had a private purpose to use the money unlawfully, unless plaintiff knew of such purpose.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mr. Presiding Justice McSurely

delivered the opinion of the court.

3. Contracts, § 161*—when illegal purpose of one party does not invalidate. In an action to recover back money paid by plaintiff to defendant under a contract providing that the money should be returned under certain conditions, it is not a defense to the action that defendant had a private purpose to use the money unlawfully, unless plaintiff knew of such purpose.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 Ill. App. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holtzman-v-israel-illappct-1915.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack