Holtzman v. Holtzman

47 A.D.2d 620, 364 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8775
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedFebruary 25, 1975
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 47 A.D.2d 620 (Holtzman v. Holtzman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holtzman v. Holtzman, 47 A.D.2d 620, 364 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

Appeal from the order of the Family Court of the State of New York, New York County, entered August 16, 1974, which denied respondent’s motion to dismiss the petition, unanimously dismissed, without costs and without disbursements. Section 1112 of the Family Court Act provides that an appeal “ may be taken as of right from any order of disposition and, in the discretion of the appropriate appellate division, from any other order ” under the Family Court Act. An order of disposition is the equivalent of a “‘final order or judgment’ ” (Matter of Taylor v. Taylor, 23 A D 2d 747). An order denying a motion to dismiss is not an order of disposition within the meaning [621]*621of the Family Court Act (Matter of Grove v. Gherico, 28 A D 2d 555, 556; Matter of State Welfare Comr. v. Mintz, 28 A D 2d 14; Matter of Hillman v. Minieozzi, 25 A D 2d 866), and accordingly, the appeal does not lie as of right. Since no application for permission to appeal was made, the appeal is not properly before this court (Firestone v. Firestone, 44 A D 2d 671, 672). We note, however, that we have examined the merits of the appeal and had the appeal been properly before this court, we would have affirmed. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Tilzer, Capozzoli and Nunez, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Matter of Keisha L. B. v. Damien R. W.
2019 NY Slip Op 6692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Inabinett v. Kelly
126 A.D.3d 701 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)
In re Carolyn Z.
53 A.D.3d 875 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Consford v. Consford
271 A.D.2d 106 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Zavistowski v. Zavistowski
54 A.D.2d 986 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
47 A.D.2d 620, 364 N.Y.S.2d 528, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holtzman-v-holtzman-nyappdiv-1975.