Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Holtzer v. London Meat Co.

Holtzer v. London Meat Co.

266 A.D.2d 26, 697 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11181
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 4, 1999
StatusPublished

This text of 266 A.D.2d 26 (Holtzer v. London Meat Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holtzer v. London Meat Co., 266 A.D.2d 26, 697 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11181 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Diane Lebedeff, J.), entered on or about September 16, 1998, which, inter alia, granted defendants’ cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Summary judgment was properly awarded since plaintiffs theory that his injury was caused by bald tires on defendants’ van is unsupported by any probative evidence in admissible form and amounts to sheer conjecture and speculation (see, Burgos v Aqueduct Realty Corp., 92 NY2d 544, 550; see also, Lynn v Lynn, 216 AD2d 194). Concur — Rosenberger, J. P., Williams, Tom, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burgos v. Aqueduct Realty Corp.
706 N.E.2d 1163 (New York Court of Appeals, 1998)
Lynn v. Lynn
216 A.D.2d 194 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
266 A.D.2d 26, 697 N.Y.S.2d 275, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holtzer-v-london-meat-co-nyappdiv-1999.