Holtzclaw v. Edmondson
39 S.E. 849, 114 Ga. 171, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 623
Opinion
1. A certified copy of a deed, taken from the proper records, is, when the loss or destruction of the original has been shown, admissible in evidence to prove the existence, genuineness, and contents of the original. Hayden v. Mitchell, 103 Ga. 431.
. There was sufficient evidence to authorize the jury to find that the defendant had acquired a good prescriptive title to the land in dispute, and a verdict in his favor was not contrary to law.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holtzclaw v. Edmondson, 39 S.E. 849, 114 Ga. 171, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 623 (Ga. 1901).
39 S.E. 849 (Holtzclaw v. Edmondson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Beall v. Francis
137 S.E. 251 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1927)
Cannon v. Gorham
71 S.E. 142 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1911)
Griffin v. Wise
41 S.E. 1003 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)
Crummey v. Bentley
40 S.E. 765 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1902)