Holtz v. City of Buffalo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holtz v. City of Buffalo

171 A.D. 976

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1915

StatusPublished

This text of 171 A.D. 976 (Holtz v. City of Buffalo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holtz v. City of Buffalo, 171 A.D. 976 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an application for a new injunction in case any attempt is made before the trial of the action to award a contract under the same specifications. Held, that' the mayor having vetoed the resolution awarding the contract to the Skinner Engine Company, it was within the discretion of the court at Special Term to vacate the temporary injunction. AU concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, without prejudice to an application for a new injunction in case any attempt is made before the trial of the action to award a contract under the same specifications. Held, that' the mayor having vetoed the resolution awarding the contract to the Skinner Engine Company, it was within the discretion of the court at Special Term to vacate the temporary injunction. AU concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

171 A.D. 976, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holtz-v-city-of-buffalo-nyappdiv-1915.