Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.
This text of Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd. (Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
2008-1370 (Opposition No. 91/176,609)
HOLT’S COMPANY,
Appellant,
v.
VIRGIN ENTERPRISES LIMITED,
Appellee.
M. Kelly Tillery, Pepper Hamilton, LLP, of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, argued for appellant.
James M. Dabney, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, of New York, New York, argued for appellee. With him on the brief were Victoria J.B. Doyle and Mitchell Epner, and John F. Duffy, of Washington, DC.
Appealed from: United States Patent and Trademark Office Trademark Trial and Appeal Board NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
Judgment
ON APPEAL from the United States Patent and Trademark Office
in CASE NO(S). 91/176,609.
This CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
Per Curiam (MAYER, CLEVENGER, and RADER Circuit Judges )
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
DATED February 6, 2009 /s/ Jan Horbaly Jan Horbaly, Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holt's Co. v. Virgin Enterprises Ltd., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holts-co-v-virgin-enterprises-ltd-cafc-2009.