Holton v. Wallace
This text of 77 F. 61 (Holton v. Wallace) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
After a. careful examination of the several errors assigned, we are unable to sustain any of them. The opinion of the circuit court is a sufficient vindication of its action in dismissing the bill. The causes of suit set up are not vested in the plaintiff, but in the corporation, or the receivers of its property, appointed by the court, and the plaintiff has not shown himself qualified to sue on the rights of either. What the circuit court has said in this respect so fully expresses our views that we adopt it, and decide the case accordingly. The decree is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
77 F. 61, 23 C.C.A. 71, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-wallace-ca3-1896.