Holton v. State
This text of 115 S.E. 284 (Holton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under repeated rulings of the Supreme Court and of this court a ground of a motion for a new trial, complaining of the admission of documentary evidence, cannot be considered, where the documentary evidence is not set forth in -the ground nor attached as an exhibit thereto. This ruling disposes of the first ground of the amendment to the motion for a new trial.
2. The verdict was authorized by the evidence, the alleged newly discovered evidence is-merely impeaching in its character, and the court did not err in refusing to grant a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
115 S.E. 284, 29 Ga. App. 387, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 19, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-state-gactapp-1923.