Holton v. Nelson

99 N.W. 1133, 92 Minn. 305, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 549
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedJune 3, 1904
DocketNos. 13,917—(53)
StatusPublished

This text of 99 N.W. 1133 (Holton v. Nelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holton v. Nelson, 99 N.W. 1133, 92 Minn. 305, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 549 (Mich. 1904).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Action to compel the specific performance of a contract to convey land. The contract was in writing. The defense to the action was that the defendant was deceived, and did not understand the terms and provisions of the writing. The question raised by this defense was submitted to the jury under fair instructions, and they found a verdict [306]*306for defendant. The assignments of error present, in substance, the question whether the evidence sustains the verdict. An examination of the evidence returned to this court leads to the conclusion, though not without some hesitation, that the verdict of the jury is sufficiently supported.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
99 N.W. 1133, 92 Minn. 305, 1904 Minn. LEXIS 549, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-nelson-minn-1904.