Holton v. McClean
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RAYMOND HOLTON, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 22-3609 (UNA) ) CARMEN McLEAN, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION
It appears that plaintiff Raymond Holton has been declared incompetent, and he brings
this civil action to have The Honorable Carmen McLean, the Associate Judge of the Superior
Court of the District of Columbia, removed from his case. The complaint must be dismissed
because this federal district court “lack[s] jurisdiction to review judicial decisions by . . . District
of Columbia courts.” Richardson v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 83 F.3d 1513, 1514
(D.C. Cir. 1996) (citations omitted); see Dorsey v. Superior Court for the District of Columbia,
709 F. App’x 22 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (per curiam). Nor may this federal district court cause a
Superior Court judge’s recusal or reassignment.
Where, as here, subject matter jurisdiction is lacking, the Court must dismiss the case.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). An Order is issued separately.
DATE: February 24, 2023 /s/ RUDOLPH CONTRERAS United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holton v. McClean (Holton v. McClean) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.