Holton v. Holton
25 S.E. 468, 99 Ga. 250
This text of 25 S.E. 468 (Holton v. Holton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holton v. Holton, 25 S.E. 468, 99 Ga. 250 (Ga. 1896).
Opinion
1. An administrator is under no duty of administering as a portion of his intestate’s estate property which did not belong to the latter.
2. The verdict, upon the substantial merits of the case, was manifestly right, and therefore should not be set aside even if the charge of the court was not in all respects accurate and correct.
Judgement affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Towner v. Rodegeb
74 P. 50 (Washington Supreme Court, 1903)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
25 S.E. 468, 99 Ga. 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-holton-ga-1896.