Holton v. Hendley

1 Ga. L. Rep. 53
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedJuly 1, 1885
StatusPublished

This text of 1 Ga. L. Rep. 53 (Holton v. Hendley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holton v. Hendley, 1 Ga. L. Rep. 53 (Ga. 1885).

Opinion

Blandford, J.

1. Where a certiorari was taken from the trial of a case of forcible entry and detainer before a justice and jury, and the plaintiff in certiorari paid the costs which had accrued and gave bond for all future costs, this was a substantial compliance with the statute, and a motion to dismiss the certiorari was properly refused. In such a case there is no eventual condemnation money except the costs. 15 Ga., 39.'

2. On the trial of a case of forcible entry and detainer a party is entitled to purge the jury by putting them on their voire dire, in order to show that they are not fair and impartial jurors. Code, §4086; 15 Ga., 39; 59 Id., 145.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1 Ga. L. Rep. 53, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-hendley-ga-1885.