Holton v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation
This text of Holton v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation (Holton v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA ASHEVILLE DIVISION 1:20 CV 7 MR WCM
ARCHIE LEE HOLTON and ) BROOKSAYNE HOLTON ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ORDER ) FREEDOM MORTGAGE ) CORPORATION ) ) Defendant. ) _______________________________ )
This matter is before the Court on the Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to Complaint by 30 Days (the “Stipulation,” Doc. 5), which indicates the parties have stipulated that Defendant’s answer or other responsive pleadings shall be due on or before February 14, 2020. While counsel are commended for working cooperatively, the validity of the Stipulation is questionable without Court approval. See DeVary v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 701 F. Supp. 2d 1096, 1110 (D. Minn. 2010) (collecting cases). Consequently, the Court will construe the Stipulation as being an Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time, which will be allowed. Accordingly, the deadline for Defendant Freedom Mortgage Corporation to file its answer or otherwise respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint is EXTENDED through and including February 14, 2020.
Signed: January 10, 2020 oJ ay Y/
W. Carleton Metcalf United States Magistrate Judge ANY
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Holton v. Freedom Mortgage Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-freedom-mortgage-corporation-ncwd-2020.