Holton v. Atlantic Department Stores, Inc.

337 So. 2d 780, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4492
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJune 4, 1976
DocketNo. 46590
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 337 So. 2d 780 (Holton v. Atlantic Department Stores, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holton v. Atlantic Department Stores, Inc., 337 So. 2d 780, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4492 (Fla. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this cause we denied certiorari. On petition for rehearing we granted certiorari and set the cause for oral argument. After hearing argument of the parties and reviewing the briefs we are of the opinion that certiorari should not have been granted. The writ is hereby discharged, Fla. App., 302 So.2d 782.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCH-ETT, JJ., concur. SUNDBERG, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ciongoli v. State
337 So. 2d 780 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
337 So. 2d 780, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holton-v-atlantic-department-stores-inc-fla-1976.