Holtman v. Holtman

187 A.D.2d 563, 591 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13030

Opinion

In an action for divorce and ancillary relief, the defendant husband appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Leis, J.), dated September 11, 1990, which awarded the plaintiff wife exclusive occupancy of the marital residence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The court did not improvidently exercise its discretion in [564]*564granting the plaintiff exclusive occupancy of the marital residence (Kurppe v Kurppe, 147 AD2d 533, 534; Preston v Preston, 147 AD2d 464). Bracken, J. P., Lawrence, Miller, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holtman v. Holtman, 187 A.D.2d 563, 591 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1992 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13030 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1992).

187 A.D.2d 563 (Holtman v. Holtman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Preston v. Preston
147 A.D.2d 464 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)
Kurppe v. Kurppe
147 A.D.2d 533 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)