Holthouse v. Rynd

9 Sadler 193

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The agreement of the 11th of July, 1885, was entirely too-indefinite to prevent the operation of the statute of frauds and perjuries; and the plaintiff’s bargain for the additional 1 foot of ground was purely oral, and, according to his own testimony, was never fully concluded. This condition of the evidence leaves us nothing to do but affirm the decree of the common pleas.

The appeal is dismissed and the decree affirmed, at tbe costs-of appellant.