Holte v. Rondeau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Holte v. Rondeau

166 A.2d 121, 103 N.H. 99, 1960 N.H. LEXIS 24

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided November 30, 1960·No. 4860·Published

Opinion

Kenison, C. J.

The question presented in this case is whether RSA 110-A:77 I (supp) permits nonresidents to obtain compensation for damages for injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident occurring in another state and involving the New Hampshire National Guard.

This case is governed by Leary v. McSwiney, decided this day. 103 N. H. 85, 88. The fact that the present case involves damage caused by a military truck rather than a military aircraft is immaterial. The plaintiffs are entitled to maintain their petition and this makes it unnecessary to consider the plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed untimely.

Remanded.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Kenison, C. J.

The question presented in this case is whether RSA 110-A:77 I (supp) permits nonresidents to obtain compensation for damages for injuries as a result of a motor vehicle accident occurring in another state and involving the New Hampshire National Guard.

This case is governed by Leary v. McSwiney, decided this day. 103 N. H. 85, 88. The fact that the present case involves damage caused by a military truck rather than a military aircraft is immaterial. The plaintiffs are entitled to maintain their petition and this makes it unnecessary to consider the plaintiffs’ contention that the defendants’ motion to dismiss was filed untimely.

Remanded.

All concurred.

Holte v. Rondeau, 166 A.2d 121, 103 N.H. 99, 1960 N.H. LEXIS 24 (N.H. 1960).

Pincite

166 A.2d 121 (Holte v. Rondeau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.