Holt v. Wood
This text of 23 Tex. 474 (Holt v. Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The judgment of the court below in this cause was, that the defendant, James T. Wood, have, and recover of -the' plaintiff, Eliza Holt, all the costs in this behalf expended, &c. The decree does not dispose of the subject-matter of the controversy between the parties, and is not therefore, such a final judgment as will support an appeal, or writ of error. In conformity with the practice of this court, established by many decisions, the writ of error must be dismissed. (See Hanks v. Thompson, 5 Texas Rep. 6; Warren v. Shuman, Id. 441; Hancock v. Metz, 7 Id. 177 ; Bradshaw v. Davis, 8 Id. 344.) It-is ordered accordingly.
Writ dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
23 Tex. 474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-wood-tex-1859.