Holt v. Winters

30 F. 29

This text of 30 F. 29 (Holt v. Winters) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holt v. Winters, 30 F. 29 (circtsdny 1887).

Opinion

Wheeler, J.

The defendant moves for an order on the plaintiff to furnish security for costs, because he is not a resident of the state of New York. He is set up in the proceedings as such resident. On all the papers it does not appear but that he is so set up properly and correctly. The motion is therefore denied. This is not intended to imply that the motion would be granted if he was shown to be a non-resident.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 F. 29, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-winters-circtsdny-1887.