Holt v. United States

552 A.2d 529, 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 28, 1989 WL 4296
District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided January 18, 1989·No. No. 85-1185·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On consideration of appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc, and the opposition thereto; and it appearing that the majority of the judges of this court has voted to grant the petition for rehearing en banc, it is

ORDERED that appellant’s petition for rehearing en banc is granted and that the opinion and judgment of August 31, 1988, 547 A.2d 158, are hereby vacated. It is

FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall schedule this matter for argument before the court sitting en banc as soon as the calendar permits. Counsel are hereby directed to provide ten copies of the briefs heretofore filed to the Clerk on or before January 80, 1989.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holt v. United States, 552 A.2d 529, 1989 D.C. App. LEXIS 28, 1989 WL 4296 (D.C. 1989).

552 A.2d 529 (Holt v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Holt v. United States
565 A.2d 970 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1989)