Holt v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias

235 F. 885, 149 C.C.A. 197, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided July 18, 1916·No. No. 2126·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

SANBORN, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). In the Mims Case, 241 U. S. 574, 36 Sup. Ct. 702, 60 L. Ed. 1179, the [888]*888Supreme Court decided that the benefit certificate of the member “was not a contract, but was a regulation subject to the possibility inherent in the case,” and that “the essence of the arrangement was that the members took the risk of events, and if the assessments levied at a certain time were insufficient to pay a benefit of a certain amount, whether from diminution of the members or any other cause, either they must pay more or tire beneficiary take less.” No possible distinction can be made between this litigation and the Mims Case brought against the same society.

The decree dismissing the bill is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holt v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias, 235 F. 885, 149 C.C.A. 197, 1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2234 (7th Cir. 1916).

235 F. 885 (Holt v. Supreme Lodge Knights of Pythias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias v. Meyer
265 U.S. 30 (Supreme Court, 1924)
United Order of Foresters v. Miller
190 N.W. 197 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1922)
Meyer v. Supreme Lodge, Knights of Pythias
177 N.W. 828 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1920)