Holt v. State

4 S.W.2d 547, 109 Tex. Crim. 288, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMarch 31, 1928
DocketNo. 11661.
StatusPublished

This text of 4 S.W.2d 547 (Holt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holt v. State, 4 S.W.2d 547, 109 Tex. Crim. 288, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222 (Tex. 1928).

Opinions

Conviction is for driving an automobile upon the highway while appellant was under the influence of intoxicating liquor, punishment being one year in the penitentiary.

The record contains a transcript and a supplemental transcript but in neither is it shown that a sentence was ever pronounced against appellant. *Page 289

Where the penalty assessed is less than death, a sentence is prerequisite to an appeal. Dodd v. State, 77 Tex. Crim. 543,279 S.W. 564; Carroll v. State, 83 Tex.Crim. Rep.,204 S.W. 334. Other authorities will be found collated under note 3, Art. 769, Vernon's C. C. P., Vol. 3, p. 150.

No jurisdiction having been conferred on this court by appeal in absence of sentence, the appeal must be dismissed.

Dismissed.

ON MOTION TO REINSTATE.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dodd v. State
179 S.W. 564 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1915)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 S.W.2d 547, 109 Tex. Crim. 288, 1928 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-state-texcrimapp-1928.