Holt v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Holt v. State

182 S.W. 1119

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 9, 1916·No. No. 3948·Published

Opinion

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of the evidence introduced on the trial of the case accompanies the record; neither does the record contain any bill of exceptions. Under such circumstances, there is nothing presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARPER, J.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, and his punishment assessed at two years’ confinement in the state penitentiary.

No statement of the evidence introduced on the trial of the case accompanies the record; neither does the record contain any bill of exceptions. Under such circumstances, there is nothing presented in the motion for a new trial we can review.

The judgment is affirmed.

Holt v. State, 182 S.W. 1119 (Tex. 1916).

Pincite

182 S.W. 1119 (Holt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.