Holt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holt v. State

519 S.W.3d 812, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 827, 2017 WL 582661

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 14, 2017·No. No. ED 103987·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Eli Holt, Sr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Earnest Eli Holt, Sr. appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We find that the motion court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Holt v. State, 519 S.W.3d 812, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 827, 2017 WL 582661 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

519 S.W.3d 812 (Holt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.