Holt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holt v. State

499 S.W.3d 385, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2016 WL 5377886

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedSeptember 27, 2016

DocketNo. ED 103986

StatusPublished

This text of 499 S.W.3d 385 (Holt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. State, 499 S.W.3d 385, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2016 WL 5377886 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[386]*386ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Earnest Holt, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[386]*386ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Earnest Holt, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

499 S.W.3d 385, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 951, 2016 WL 5377886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-state-moctapp-2016.