Holt v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holt v. State

499 S.W.3d 382, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 952, 2016 WL 5376348

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 27, 2016·No. No. ED 103985·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Earnest Holt, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM

The movant, Earnest Holt, appeals the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal and find no clear error. Rule 24.035(k). An opinion would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.

We affirm the motion court’s judgment denying the movant’s Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 84.16(b)(2).

Holt v. State, 499 S.W.3d 382, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 952, 2016 WL 5376348 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

499 S.W.3d 382 (Holt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.