Holt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holt v. State

183 S.E. 215, 52 Ga. App. 358, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 629

Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided January 9, 1936·No. 25359·Published

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

Since all persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals, the evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of possessing whisky; and the grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur. L. M. Wyatt, L. B. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

Since all persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals, the evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of possessing whisky; and the grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur. L. M. Wyatt, L. B. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Holt v. State, 183 S.E. 215, 52 Ga. App. 358, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

183 S.E. 215 (Holt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.