Holt v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Holt v. State

183 S.E. 215, 52 Ga. App. 358, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 629

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 9, 1936

Docket25359

StatusPublished

This text of 183 S.E. 215 (Holt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. State, 183 S.E. 215, 52 Ga. App. 358, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 629 (Ga. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, O. J.

Since all persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals, the evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of possessing whisky; and the grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur. L. M. Wyatt, L. B. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, O. J.

Since all persons who aid and abet another in the commission of a misdemeanor are guilty as principals, the evidence amply authorized the defendant’s conviction of the offense of possessing whisky; and the grounds of the motion for a new trial show no cause for reversal of the judgment.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre amd Guerry, JJ., concur. L. M. Wyatt, L. B. Morgan, for plaintiff in error. L. L. Meadors, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

183 S.E. 215, 52 Ga. App. 358, 1936 Ga. App. LEXIS 629, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-state-gactapp-1936.