Holt v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Holt v. State

216 So. 3d 764, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Holt v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 12029 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 28, 2017·No. Case No. 2D15-3388·Published

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Ronald Holt seeks review of his judgment and sentences for trafficking in cannabis and manufacture of marijuana. We affirm Holt’s convictions without further comment. Based on the State’s concession of error, we reverse the portion of Holt’s sentence imposing a $50,000 fine. On remand, the trial court is required to impose the mandatory $25,000 fine under section 893.135(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2013), which is the applicable trafficking statute.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Ronald Holt seeks review of his judgment and sentences for trafficking in cannabis and manufacture of marijuana. We affirm Holt’s convictions without further comment. Based on the State’s concession of error, we reverse the portion of Holt’s sentence imposing a $50,000 fine. On remand, the trial court is required to impose the mandatory $25,000 fine under section 893.135(l)(a)(l), Florida Statutes (2013), which is the applicable trafficking statute.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded.

MORRIS and BLACK, JJ., Concur.

Holt v. State, 216 So. 3d 764, 2017 Fla. App. LEXIS 5898 (Fla. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

216 So. 3d 764 (Holt v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.