Holt v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Holt v. State

26 So. 2d 918, 248 Ala. 700

CourtSupreme Court of Alabama

DecidedMay 9, 1946

Docket1 Div. 244.

StatusPublished

This text of 26 So. 2d 918 (Holt v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. State, 26 So. 2d 918, 248 Ala. 700 (Ala. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for twenty-five years.

The trial was conducted in an orderly and careful manner. Defendant was represented by experienced counsel. The jury was properly instructed, and there is nothing in the record which was prejudicial to defendant or improper. The exceptions noted are of such sort as not to need discussion. No reversible error appears, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOSTER, Justice.

Appellant was convicted of murder in the second degree, and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the penitentiary for twenty-five years.

The trial was conducted in an orderly and careful manner. Defendant was represented by experienced counsel. The jury was properly instructed, and there is nothing in the record which was prejudicial to defendant or improper. The exceptions noted are of such sort as not to need discussion. No reversible error appears, and the judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

GARDNER, C. J., and LAWSON and STAKELY, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

26 So. 2d 918, 248 Ala. 700, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-state-ala-1946.