Holt v. Richardson

67 S.E. 798, 134 Ga. 287, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 171
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided March 19, 1910·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

The suit is in trespass against an officer for an alleged illegal eviction of the defendant under a dispossessory warrant issued under the Civil Code, § 4821. The parties concede that the only question in the ease is that shown.by the syllabus; and the ruling there made is fully supported by the authorities. Knoxville City Mills Co. v. Lovinger, 83 Ga. 563 (10 S. E. 230) ; Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722 (45 S. E. 42).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holt v. Richardson, 67 S.E. 798, 134 Ga. 287, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 171 (Ga. 1910).

67 S.E. 798 (Holt v. Richardson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mobley v. Chamblee
148 S.E. 306 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Cook v. Pardee
3 Ohio App. 362 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 1914)