Holt v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Georgia

Holt v. Richardson

67 S.E. 798, 134 Ga. 287, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 171

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedMarch 19, 1910

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 67 S.E. 798 (Holt v. Richardson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. Richardson, 67 S.E. 798, 134 Ga. 287, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 171 (Ga. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

Evans, P. J.

The suit is in trespass against an officer for an alleged illegal eviction of the defendant under a dispossessory warrant issued under the Civil Code, § 4821. The parties concede that the only question in the ease is that shown.by the syllabus; and the ruling there made is fully supported by the authorities. Knoxville City Mills Co. v. Lovinger, 83 Ga. 563 (10 S. E. 230) ; Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722 (45 S. E. 42).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Evans, P. J.

The suit is in trespass against an officer for an alleged illegal eviction of the defendant under a dispossessory warrant issued under the Civil Code, § 4821. The parties concede that the only question in the ease is that shown.by the syllabus; and the ruling there made is fully supported by the authorities. Knoxville City Mills Co. v. Lovinger, 83 Ga. 563 (10 S. E. 230) ; Rusk v. Hill, 117 Ga. 722 (45 S. E. 42).

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except Fish, G. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 S.E. 798, 134 Ga. 287, 1910 Ga. LEXIS 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-richardson-ga-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack