Holt v. Mansfield

Missouri Court of Appeals

Holt v. Mansfield

83 Mo. App. 191, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 149

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 1900

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 83 Mo. App. 191 (Holt v. Mansfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. Mansfield, 83 Mo. App. 191, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 149 (Mo. Ct. App. 1900).

Pincite

Opinion

BLAND,' P. J.

A motion to quash an execution issued on a revival judgment in the above entitled cause was sustained, from which ruling Holt, the execution plaintiff, appealed. The judgment was revived on a petition and ordinary summons, and was by default. As we held in Armstrong ,v. Crooks, decided at this term, the judgment of revival is void because by default and not on scire facias. Eor the reasons stated in the latter case, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Judge Bond concurs; Judge Biggs dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BLAND,' P. J.

A motion to quash an execution issued on a revival judgment in the above entitled cause was sustained, from which ruling Holt, the execution plaintiff, appealed. The judgment was revived on a petition and ordinary summons, and was by default. As we held in Armstrong ,v. Crooks, decided at this term, the judgment of revival is void because by default and not on scire facias. Eor the reasons stated in the latter case, the judgment of the circuit court is affirmed.

Judge Bond concurs; Judge Biggs dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

83 Mo. App. 191, 1900 Mo. App. LEXIS 149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-mansfield-moctapp-1900.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack