Holt v. Kelley
73 A. 947, 224 Pa. 620, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 854
Opinion
These appeals involve the same questions and were argued together. The facts that gave rise to them, the contentions of the parties, and the grounds on which they were submitted to the jury are clearly set out in the charge of Judge Reed, specially presiding. We find no error of which the appellants can justly complain, and the judgments are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holt v. Kelley, 73 A. 947, 224 Pa. 620, 1909 Pa. LEXIS 854 (Pa. 1909).
73 A. 947 (Holt v. Kelley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Muncey Coal Mining Co. v. Muncey
268 S.W. 293 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1925)
Daniels v. Lehigh Portland Cement Co.
126 A. 761 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1924)
Oliver v. Polson
201 P. 289 (Washington Supreme Court, 1921)