Holt v. Holt

117 Mass. 202, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 192
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 27, 1875·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Colt, J.

This case comes within the rule laid down in Peabody v. Peabody, 104 Mass. 195. The charge of the wife is that [204] the libellee, being of sufficient ability, grossly, wantonly and cruelly refuses and neglects to provide suitable maintenance for her. We cannot say, upon the facts reported, that the judge who heard the case improperly refused to grant a divorce. He may have well found that the necessary element of cruelty, “ causing injury to health, or danger of such injury, or reasonable apprehension thereof,” was wanting. Libel dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holt v. Holt, 117 Mass. 202, 1875 Mass. LEXIS 192 (Mass. 1875).

117 Mass. 202 (Holt v. Holt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Young v. Young
129 N.E.2d 894 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1955)
Rubinstein v. Rubinstein
66 N.E.2d 793 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1946)
Webster v. Webster
163 N.E. 197 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1928)
Curtiss v. Curtiss
136 N.E. 829 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1922)
Keenan v. Keenan
106 N.E. 568 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1914)
Smith v. Smith
22 Kan. 699 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1879)