Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance
80 N.E.2d 364, 297 N.Y. 987, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1064
This text of 80 N.E.2d 364 (Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance, 80 N.E.2d 364, 297 N.Y. 987, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1064 (N.Y. 1948).
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Thacher and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Desmond and Dye, JJ., on the ground that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment and an assessment of damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
80 N.E.2d 364, 297 N.Y. 987, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1064, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-fidelity-phoenix-fire-insurance-ny-1948.