Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance
80 N.E.2d 364, 297 N.Y. 987, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1064
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Loughran, Ch. J., Lewis, Conway, Thacher and Fuld, JJ. Dissenting: Desmond and Dye, JJ., on the ground that plaintiff was entitled to summary judgment and an assessment of damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance, 80 N.E.2d 364, 297 N.Y. 987, 1948 N.Y. LEXIS 1064 (N.Y. 1948).
80 N.E.2d 364 (Holt v. Fidelity Phoenix Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.