Holt v. Cowart

Supreme Court of Florida

Holt v. Cowart

193 So. 860, 141 Fla. 646, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 824

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 23, 1940·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the record in this case fails to reveal any reversible error; therefore, the final decree entered by the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Wi-iitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the record in this case fails to reveal any reversible error; therefore, the final decree entered by the chancellor is—

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., and Buford and Ti-iomas, J. J., concur. Brown, J., concurs in opinion and judgment. Justices Wi-iitfield and Chapman not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Holt v. Cowart, 193 So. 860, 141 Fla. 646, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 824 (Fla. 1940).

Pincite

193 So. 860 (Holt v. Cowart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.