Holt v. City of Birmingham

186 So. 549, 237 Ala. 196, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 159
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided February 9, 1939·No. 6 Div. 397.·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

ANDERSON, Chief Justice.

This is an appeal from an interlocutory decree overruling the appellant’s demurrer to the bill of complaint and is controlled by Section 6079 of the Code of 1923. Said section provides that the appeals therein covered are to be taken within thirty days from the rendition of the decree. The decree here was 'rendered on August the 22nd and the appeal was taken September the 22nd. August has thirty-one days and the appeal was not taken within thirty days as required by the statute. Blackburn v. Huber Manufacturing Co., 135 Ala. 598, 33 So. 160; Lide v. Park, 132 Ala. 222, 31 So. 360; Dennis et al. v. Currie, 142 Ala. 637, 38 So. 802; Boshell v. Phillips, 207 Ala. 628, 93 So. 576.

This being a question of jurisdiction, the point must be taken by this court ex mero motu. The appeal is accordingly dismissed.

Appeal dismissed. •

THOMAS, BROWN, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Holt v. City of Birmingham, 186 So. 549, 237 Ala. 196, 1939 Ala. LEXIS 159 (Ala. 1939).

186 So. 549 (Holt v. City of Birmingham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Evans v. Guy
105 So. 2d 61 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Harden v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.
101 So. 2d 302 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1958)
Osbourn v. Lo Bue
53 So. 2d 610 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1951)
Hinson v. Hinson
43 So. 2d 130 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1949)
Gibson v. Edwards
16 So. 2d 865 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1944)