Holt v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holt v. Board of Education

74 A.D.2d 839, 425 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10600

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 10, 1980

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 74 A.D.2d 839 (Holt v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt v. Board of Education, 74 A.D.2d 839, 425 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10600 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

In two proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to remove certain material from petitioner’s personnel file, the petitioner appeals from two judgments (one in each proceeding) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, both dated December 11, 1978, each of which dismissed the petition. Judgments affirmed, with separate bills of $50 costs and disbursements. The letters sent to petitioner fell within the bounds of permissible administrative evaluation. Petitioner failed to make out a claim of stigmatization, alleging neither publication nor falsehood (see Gentile v Wallen, 562 F2d 193). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In two proceedings pursuant to CPLR article 78, inter alia, to compel the respondents to remove certain material from petitioner’s personnel file, the petitioner appeals from two judgments (one in each proceeding) of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, both dated December 11, 1978, each of which dismissed the petition. Judgments affirmed, with separate bills of $50 costs and disbursements. The letters sent to petitioner fell within the bounds of permissible administrative evaluation. Petitioner failed to make out a claim of stigmatization, alleging neither publication nor falsehood (see Gentile v Wallen, 562 F2d 193). Mollen, P. J., Damiani, Gulotta and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

74 A.D.2d 839, 425 N.Y.S.2d 529, 1980 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack