Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. v. Wolman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. v. Wolman

47 A.D.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9261

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 3, 1975

StatusPublished

This text of 47 A.D.2d 872 (Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. v. Wolman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt, Rinehart & Winston, Inc. v. Wolman, 47 A.D.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9261 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 17, 1974 granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the amount of $55,000 plus interest, costs and disbursements and judgment entered thereon on December 19, 1974, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion for summary judgment denied, and judgment vacated, with $60 costs and disbursements to appellants. The record presents issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment. Some of those issues are as follows: Whether the use of the allegedly plagiarized materials totaling approximately-1,200 pages constituted a breach of the warranty of originality; whether use of such materials was proper — coming within the doctrine of "Fair Use”; whether the proper consents were obtained, thereby permitting use of the subject materials; and whether plaintiff’s rejection of the manuscript was based upon its good faith determination that the materials were not satisfactory. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered December 17, 1974 granting plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment in the amount of $55,000 plus interest, costs and disbursements and judgment entered thereon on December 19, 1974, unanimously reversed, on the law, the motion for summary judgment denied, and judgment vacated, with $60 costs and disbursements to appellants. The record presents issues of fact which preclude the granting of summary judgment. Some of those issues are as follows: Whether the use of the allegedly plagiarized materials totaling approximately-1,200 pages constituted a breach of the warranty of originality; whether use of such materials was proper — coming within the doctrine of "Fair Use”; whether the proper consents were obtained, thereby permitting use of the subject materials; and whether plaintiff’s rejection of the manuscript was based upon its good faith determination that the materials were not satisfactory. Concur — Markewich, J. P., Murphy, Tilzer and Lane, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

47 A.D.2d 872, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9261, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-rinehart-winston-inc-v-wolman-nyappdiv-1975.