Holt ex rel. Holt v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Holt ex rel. Holt v. United States

33 Cust. Ct. 478, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1030

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedDecember 22, 1954

DocketNo. 58631; petition 7098-R (West Palm Beach)

StatusPublished

This text of 33 Cust. Ct. 478 (Holt ex rel. Holt v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt ex rel. Holt v. United States, 33 Cust. Ct. 478, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1030 (cusc 1954).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom the testimony, it appeared that at the time of entry of the instant merchandise, there arose a difference of opinion between the petitioner and the appraiser as to the correct value for the merchandise in issue; that, after several conferences between the broker and the appraiser, entries covering similar shipments were amended to conform to the value considered by the appraiser; that, by agreement of the parties, it was decided to make a test case of the instant petition to determine whether export value, contended for by the importer, or foreign value, determined applicable by the appraiser, was the proper basis for valuation purposes; and that the reappraisement litigation resulted in favor of the appraiser’s finding of foreign value. Upon consideration of the evidence, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

Lawrence, J.

Prom the testimony, it appeared that at the time of entry of the instant merchandise, there arose a difference of opinion between the petitioner and the appraiser as to the correct value for the merchandise in issue; that, after several conferences between the broker and the appraiser, entries covering similar shipments were amended to conform to the value considered by the appraiser; that, by agreement of the parties, it was decided to make a test case of the instant petition to determine whether export value, contended for by the importer, or foreign value, determined applicable by the appraiser, was the proper basis for valuation purposes; and that the reappraisement litigation resulted in favor of the appraiser’s finding of foreign value. Upon consideration of the evidence, it was held that there was no intention to defraud the revenue of the United States or to conceal or misrepresent the facts of the case or to deceive the appraiser as to the value of the merchandise. The petition was therefore granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

33 Cust. Ct. 478, 1954 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-ex-rel-holt-v-united-states-cusc-1954.