Holt & Duggan Co. v. Clary

90 S.E. 381, 146 Ga. 46, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 570
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedOctober 20, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 90 S.E. 381 (Holt & Duggan Co. v. Clary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Holt & Duggan Co. v. Clary, 90 S.E. 381, 146 Ga. 46, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 570 (Ga. 1916).

Opinion

Beck, J.

The defendant in this ease filed his affidavit of illegality to prevent the enforcement of the mortgage fi. fa. based upon the foreclosure of the mortgage which he had given to secure the purchase-price of the article of personal property which he had bought from the plaintiffs. In the mortgage it was stipulated that “Holt & Duggan Co. [the vendor and'mortgagee] guarantees-above property only as to title.” This stipulation in connection with the other terms of the note and mortgage constitutes a complete contract, so far as relates to the subject of warranty, and could not be varied or added to by parol evidence as to any oral agreement made prior to or at the time of the sale and purchase of the property for which the note was given. Armistead v. Weaver, 140 Ga. 740 (79 S. E. 783); Forsyth Mfg. Co. v. Castlen, 112 Ga. 199 (37 S. E. 485, 81 Am. St. R. 28); Pryor v. Ludden & Bates, 134 Ga. 288 (67 S. E. 654, 28 L. R. A. (N. S.) 267). It would have been a violation of the rule just stated, to allow the defendant to prove the express warranty contained in that part of the contract quoted in the headnote. The demurrer to the affidavit of illegality should have been sustained.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Fvans, P. J., disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. Ballard
26 S.E.2d 542 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1943)
Butts v. Groover
16 S.E.2d 894 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1941)
White v. General Discount Corp.
3 S.E.2d 214 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1939)
Frick Co. v. Lawson
179 S.E. 274 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1935)
Turnmire v. Higgins
168 S.E. 5 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1933)
Morton v. Tharpe & Co.
154 S.E. 716 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1930)
Barfield v. Farkas
150 S.E. 600 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1929)
Hardy v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.
144 S.E. 327 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1928)
Roberts v. Investors Savings Co.
113 S.E. 398 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1922)
Smith v. Lawrence
99 S.E. 536 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)
Bass & Co. v. Vinson
98 S.E. 365 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
90 S.E. 381, 146 Ga. 46, 1916 Ga. LEXIS 570, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-duggan-co-v-clary-ga-1916.