Holt County v. Board of Supervisors

Nebraska Supreme Court

Holt County v. Board of Supervisors

154 N.W. 539, 98 Neb. 782, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 318

CourtNebraska Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 16, 1915

DocketNo. 19112

StatusPublished

This text of 154 N.W. 539 (Holt County v. Board of Supervisors) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nebraska Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Holt County v. Board of Supervisors, 154 N.W. 539, 98 Neb. 782, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 318 (Neb. 1915).

Pincite

Opinion

Letton, J.

This action is similar in its facts to Holt County v. Tomlinson, ante, p. 777, although the defendants comprising the members of the board of supervisors are not identically the same persons as the defendants in the former suit, and the alleged violations of duty are not the same. In this case no appearance had been made by the defendants when the county attorney on behalf of the county moved that it should be dismissed from the action as party plaintiff. In this case, also, the court dismissed the entire action.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the former case, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to sustain the motion so far as to dismiss the county as a party plaintiff, but to allow the action to proceed in the name of M. T. Hiatt and H. M. Uttley, if they so desire.

Reversed.

Hamer, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Letton, J.

This action is similar in its facts to Holt County v. Tomlinson, ante, p. 777, although the defendants comprising the members of the board of supervisors are not identically the same persons as the defendants in the former suit, and the alleged violations of duty are not the same. In this case no appearance had been made by the defendants when the county attorney on behalf of the county moved that it should be dismissed from the action as party plaintiff. In this case, also, the court dismissed the entire action.

For the reasons stated in the opinion in the former case, the judgment of the district court is reversed and the cause remanded, with directions to sustain the motion so far as to dismiss the county as a party plaintiff, but to allow the action to proceed in the name of M. T. Hiatt and H. M. Uttley, if they so desire.

Reversed.

Hamer, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

154 N.W. 539, 98 Neb. 782, 1915 Neb. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/holt-county-v-board-of-supervisors-neb-1915.